CASE STUDY REVISIT:
Carnegie Global Ecology Center
Computing Climate Change: Innovative strategies serve this small lab and office complex well, though some required slight adjustments.
Based on what you have seen and read about this project, how would you grade it? Use the stars below to indicate your assessment, five stars being the highest rating.
KEY PARAMETERS
Location Stanford, California (San Francisco Bay watershed)
Gross area 10,890 ft2 (1,000 m2)
Cost $4 million
Completed March 2004
Program Lab, office
| Click to enlarge |
![]() |
| Annual Energy Use 2009-2010 |
TEAM
Owner Carnegie Institution Department
of Global Ecology
Architect and interior designer
EHDD Architecture
Engineers Rumsey Engineers now Integral Group
(mechanical and plumbing)
General Contractor DPR Construction
Carnegie Global Ecology Center on the Stanford University campus in California was designed to house a team of researchers studying, among other things, climate change. It’s not surprising then that carbon emissions reduction was a top priority for the project. Energy monitoring since the building’s March 2004 completion shows that it’s running about 27 percent above its predicted annual energy use—a difference the designers blame on computers. “Our understanding is that the server room energy use is incredibly high due to the increased use of computing in their research work over time,” says EHDD’s Brad Jacobson, AIA.
The project’s innovative energy conserving strategies appear to be working quite well. For example, it has sprinklers that spray water onto the roof at night where it cools off by radiating heat into space before being collected to cool the building. The scientists in the building applied their global energy transfer models to this night sky cooling system, and “their calculations almost exactly match the actual performance of that system,” says EHDD principal Scott Shell, FAIA.
A few other green products and technologies introduced their own specific challenges:
• Daylight-dimming controls didn’t work properly, causing bulbs to burn out very prematurely. That problem was initially blamed on the lack of a burn-in period, but “in the end we discovered that they were wired incorrectly,” reports Shell.
• For reasons that were never fully established, some of the resin-based decomposed granite paving never hardened up adequately, and was replaced with unit pavers.
• The bathrooms have operable windows, but they’ve been kept shut to prevent noise from the high-velocity Excel hand dryers traveling outside and then back into the adjacent seminar room.
• The Falcon waterless urinals suffered uric acid crystal build-up, requiring snaking every two months. That, along with the cost of cartridges, led the facility manager to replace them with flushing urinals.
A glare problem from sunlight reflecting off the greenhouses to the north of the building was addressed by installing a strip of tinted film on the windows. Also, maintaining the native landscaping has been a challenge, as other species find their way into the gardens while the natives are slow to mature. “I was told that California native oaks grow slowly—now I know what slow means,” says Shell.
These challenges notwithstanding, Shell believes that “overall, the project continues to be a real success,” showcasing the benefits of integrated solutions including daylighting, solar control, natural ventilation (upstairs), and radiant heating and cooling.


Sign in to Comment
To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.