subscribe
e-newsletter
digital edition
product info
advertise
Mcgraw Hill Construction
    Subscribe to GreenSource the magazine
of sustainable design: $19.95 for one year
comment

CASE STUDY REVISIT:
Calpers Headquarters Complex

Sacramento, California

Better Late Than Never: Commissioning was initially truncated due to schedule constraints, but facility managers are back on the case.

Originally published April 2007
Pickard Chilton

By Nadav Malin

The complex covers two city blocks and includes 555,000 square feet of office space, 25,000 square feet of retail space, and parking for 1,000 cars.
Photo © Peter Aaron/Esto
The complex covers two city blocks and includes 555,000 square feet of office space, 25,000 square feet of retail space, and parking for 1,000 cars.

Rate this project:
Based on what you have seen and read about this project, how would you grade it? Use the stars below to indicate your assessment, five stars being the highest rating.
----- Advertising -----

KEY PARAMETERS
Location Sacramento, California

Gross area 1.1 million ft2 (102,000 m2)

Cost $192 million

Completed November 2005

Annual purchased energy use (2010) 93 kBtu/ft2 (1,060 MJ/m2)

Annual carbon footprint 18CO2/ft2 (88 kg CO2/m2)

Program Office, retail, and parking

Click to enlarge
Annual Energy Use 2009-2010

TEAM
Owner California Public Employees’ Retirement System
Architect Pickard Chilton
Engineers Nolte & Associates, Inc. (civil); Carter & Burgess and CYS
Structural Engineers (structural); Arup (MEP, facade)
Facility manager Colliers International

In our original coverage of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Headquarters expansion, we noted that, a year into occupancy, the facility managers were still working kinks out of the systems. With two large buildings plus underground parking all sharing a common mechanical system, and lots of high-tech design strategies intended to save energy and increase comfort, those systems were perhaps overly ambitious for the minimally coordinated stream of separate contractors who installed them in a process dictated by public bidding laws.

In 2010, five years after occupancy, facility managers were still working to unravel the tangle of control sequences and sensors that were never fully tested or calibrated upon completion, despite the fact that the project earned a LEED Gold rating with a point for enhanced commissioning. “Better commissioning at the outset would have been a great benefit,” notes James Croft, sustainable operations program coordinator for CalPERS Facilities Management Section.

A summary of the energy bills from the past three years shows that electricity use, dominated by an on-site data center, is finally in line with projections made during design. Natural gas use continues to be much higher than predicted, however.

Croft has only been involved at the facility since 2009, but the facilities management firm, Colliers International, “has been working since 2006 without a full commissioning report or systems manual,” he reports. Various pieces of the puzzle are now falling into place. A grant from the California Building Commission has funded work on the zoning of daylighting circuits, according to Croft.

A full retrocommissioning process is in the works, informed by CalPERS’ success achieving LEED for Existing Buildings Silver certification for the older Lincoln Plaza North complex in 2009. The amount of documentation needed for that process “made us realize how important it is to maintain documents in the new building,” notes Croft.

In the meantime, sensors on the air-handling units have been calibrated, resolving a situation in which different units serving a common plenum were fighting each other, with some in heating mode and the others in cooling mode. And demand-control sensors for the parking garage exhaust fans have been replaced, to stop the fans from running continuously. It has taken a while, but the project is finally getting the attention it needs to achieve its potential.

 

This article appeared in the March 2011 print issue of GreenSource Magazine.

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.

----- Advertising -----
Click here to go to product info Page
McGraw-Hill Construction

Search Sweets

Example: Building Products, CAD, BIM, Catalogs
Search
Reader Feedback
Most Commented Most Recommended
Rankings reflect comments made in the past 14 days
Rankings reflect comments made in the past 14 days
Recently Posted Reader Photos

View all photo galleries >>
Recent Forum Discussions

View all forum discusions >>