e-newsletter
digital edition
product info
advertise
comment

CASE STUDY: REVISIT
Lewis & Clark State Office Building

Jefferson City, Missouri

Holding Steady: Robust systems and good management deliver consistent energy savings.

Originally published in November 2006
BNIM

By Nadav Malin

Certified sustainable
lumber from Missouriís
only FSC-certified
forest was used in
the atrium.
Photo © Mike Sinclair

Certified sustainable lumber from Missouriís only FSC-certified forest was used in the atrium.

Rate this project:
Based on what you have seen and read about this project, how would you grade it? Use the stars below to indicate your assessment, five stars being the highest rating.
----- Advertising -----

KEY PARAMETERS
Location Jefferson City, Missouri

Gross area 120,000 ft2 (19,300 m2)

Cost $18.1 million

Annual purchased energy use (2010) 74 kBtu/ft2 (845 MJ/m2)

Annual carbon footprint 27 lbs. CO2/ft2 (132 kg CO2/m2)

Completed March 2005

Program Offices, conference rooms, food service, atrium

TEAM
Owner State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Architect and Interior designer BNIM
Commissioning agent sys-tek
Lighting Clanton Engineering

The Lewis & Clark office building for Missouri's Department of Natural Resources was designed to showcase the potential for low-energy, green design on a tight budget. The project features under-floor air distribution, daylighting, photovoltaic panels on the roof, solar water-heating panels, and a graywater toilet-flush system using captured rainwater runoff from the building's roof.

The building's actual energy use is consistent with the results of a simulation created by the commissioning agent, sys-tek, based on the building as built. Assuming that the energy utilization intensity (EUI) predicted in the original designs follows the ASHRAE and LEED practice in effect at the time and excludes plug loads, this energy use is also consistent with the design prediction and is remarkably consistent from year to year, both in total usage and in the breakdown by fuel.

A 2007 occupant survey revealed that staff were generally pleased with the lighting and air quality, and satisfied with the temperature controls, but split between satisfied and dissatisfied on the acoustics and on the building as a whole. “The biggest problem is that everyone is in a cube, and they weren't in cubes before,” explains Leigh Ann Wilbers, general services program director at the department.

Our original story reported on a problem with exterior light shades that were not installed as designed and hence allow some direct sunlight penetration, creating glare at some workstations during certain times of day. Staff resorted to tacking up cardboard to block the offending rays, a problem that still awaits a more elegant solution, according to Wilburs. With the exception of those trouble spots, Wilburs reports that the daylighting continues to be appreciated.

Getting access to multiple years of actual utility-bill data is unusual, notes project architect Laura Lesniewski of BNIM, and a credit to both the facility managers and the architects for continuing to track and share it. The consistency of that data suggests that the systems are both robust and well managed, if not as aggressive as the aspirations reflected in the early design goals. Unfortunately, the contributions of the photovoltaics in the standing seam room are not being tracked separately, so we don't know whether they are providing the planned 2.5 percent of the building's energy needs or not.

 

This article appeared in the May 2011 print issue of GreenSource Magazine.

 Reader Comments:

Sign in to Comment

To write a comment about this story, please sign in. If this is your first time commenting on this site, you will be required to fill out a brief registration form. Your public username will be the beginning of the email address that you enter into the form (everything before the @ symbol). Other than that, none of the information that you enter will be publically displayed.

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.

----- Advertising -----
Click here to go to product info Page
Sweets, Search Building Products
Search
Reader Feedback
Most Commented Most Recommended
Rankings reflect comments made in the past 14 days
Rankings reflect comments made in the past 14 days
Recently Posted Reader Photos

View all photo galleries >>
Recent Forum Discussions

View all forum discusions >>