commentStates Adopting BIM
The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) began using building information modeling (BIM) in 2003; by 2007, the agency was requiring basic models for all projects and encouraging more complex models incorporating energy performance and construction scheduling. Now, both Wisconsin and Texas have adopted BIM programs for state construction projects, and other states are considering similar programs.
Based on what you have seen and read about this project, how would you grade it? Use the stars below to indicate your assessment, five stars being the highest rating.
For GSA and state governments, BIM offers not only a way to get project teams on the same page but also a way to track energy performance, renovations, and other changes over a building’s life.
In Wisconsin, the state began exploring BIM after an executive order signed by the governor in 2006 required all state buildings to conform to high environmental and energy-efficiency standards. In July 2009, after a 13-project pilot program, the state became the first to require advanced models for all state projects with budgets over $5 million and new construction projects over $2.5 million. The state requires building information models from several members of a project team, including architects and structural, mechanical, and plumbing engineers. It does not, however, require the team to work on a single model or even in a particular modeling software—the state accepts models created in five software packages.
Texas also requires BIM use for state projects, but is taking a slightly different approach to its guidelines, moving toward a single model for each project that can track changes over time. According to Chris Tisdel, Associate AIA, director of BIM for the Texas Facilities Commission (TFC), the state has adopted BIM first for new state construction projects; renovations and legacy projects will follow.
TFC has created a template that allows teams to create a model conforming to the state’s standards with all team members working in that same model. Tisdel says the model will be stored on a state server that project teams can access, and will ensure that all models will be made in the same software—Autodesk’s Revit. Tisdel notes that the agency chose Autodesk products because the majority of firms it works with already have the software, thus lowering upfront costs for complying with the new requirements. If TFC had allowed multiple software packages, he says, “forty years down the road you’d be looking at multiple building models on multiple platforms, and that’s a nightmare.”
The next step is to use BIM as a way to track building changes over time. “We have a huge amount of information documenting what the building was like when it was first built,” he says. “Ten or twenty years later, those drawings mean very little because they are hard to update.” TFC hopes to put this legacy information into BIM software to allow the agency to track building changes as well as energy performance and other metrics. “We consider the building model to be a life-cycle model,” Tisdel states.
Other states as well as private-sector owners are looking to GSA, Wisconsin, and Texas for guidance on incorporating BIM into their own practices. Tisdel said that officials in Ohio have contacted him, along with officials in several municipalities across the country.
Copyright 2009 by BuildingGreen, LLC
|
|
